TOWARD TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
VIA

EMERGING MOLECULAR NANOTECHNOLOGY

 

SINCLAIR T. WANG

 

ABSTRACT

1. Impact of Human Activities on Environment Sustainability

1.1. Environmental Impact from Energy Production
1.2. Environmental Impact from Production and Consumption

2. Environmental Protection and Remediation by MNT

2.1. Control of Pollution at Source by MNT

2.1.1. Control of Pollution from Energy Production by MNT
2.1.2. Control of Pollution from Material Production and Product Manufacturing by MNT
2.1.3. Control of Pollution from Human Consumption MNT

2.2. Remediation of Existing Environmental Problems

2.2.1. Acid Rain and Smog
2.2.2. Global Warming
2.2.3. Ozone Layer Depletion
2.2.4. Toxic Wastes and Water and Soil Contaminations
2.2.5. Nuclear Wastes

3. Conclusions


Reference

 

 

 

ABSTRACT

With current state-of-art technologies, human race as well as other species on earth is victimized by air and water pollutions, threatened by hazardous and nuclear wastes. Acid rain, global warming, ozone depletion have become household daily vocabularies. Environmental sustainability based on technology-to-date is pessimistic.

 

Emerging molecular nanotechnology in all industrial fronts, such as nanoelectronics, nanobiotechnology, nanomaterial, nanoenergy, and etc., offer radical tools for human society for the first time to be on the upper hand in the struggle toward sustainable economic growth. Furthermore, it will have extra capacities for human civilization not only to remediate environmental liabilities accumulated since industrial revolution of 18th century, but also to produce unlimited material and energy with ultra green processes.

 

This paper traces the causes of sustainability problems and diagnoses the defects of current industrial manufacturing processes in light of molecular nanotechnology. This paper also analyzes and extrapolates the prospect of additional capabilities that human may gain from the development of nanotechnology that have the potential to ascertain environmental sustainability, restore global environment while we still enjoy the abundance of material and energy.

 

Keywords: molecular nanotechnology (MNT), top-down bulk technology (TDBT), nanoecology, nanoenergy, artificial photosynthesis, nano-robot (nanobot), acid rain, global warming, ozone layer depletion, toxic wastes, soil contamination, nuclear wastes.

 

 

1. Impact of Human Activities on Environment Sustainability

 

All human activities are motivated by survival. For that, human produce and consume energy, material, and products. Before molecular nanotechnology (MNT), the technology employed for production is a top-down bulk technology (TDBT), whether it’s of traditional or of high technology. Due to TDBT’s inherent shortcomings, such as low efficiency, imprecise, crude, and etc., throughout the processes, energy and material are excessively wasted; pollutants and wastes are extensively generated. In addition, human consumption also consumes large quantity of energy and material, and generates dramatic amount of pollutants and wastes. All above threatens the sustainability of our environment.

 

Human survival activities can be summarized into energy production, material production, product manufacturing and consumption, (see Fig. 1). Due to technology-to-date (TTD) is primitive in contrast with the emerging MNT; all human activities are exerting tremendous pressure on the environmental sustainability. In addition, current pollution abatement technologies are based on TDBT; secondary pollution generated essentially cancels the benefit. Available data indicate global environment is still worsening. Human is suffering from degrading environmental quality, diminishing natural resources, and environmental related illness. If there is no fundamental technological or non-technological paradigm shift, a catastrophic destruction is predicted.

 


Fig. 1. Impact of Human Activities on Environmental Sustainability

While MNT is still under developing, it's worthwhile to diagnose the causes and effects of current environmental sustainability predicament; therefore the targets for MNT R&D specific for green production and products, as well as restoring the environment can be identified.

 

1.1. Environmental Impact from Energy Production

Major energy production processes adopted currently are hydroelectric, fossil fuels, and nuclear. They are the major pollution sources and destructive forces to the environment. Combined they produce more pollution and destroy more environment than any other single industry (1,2,3).  Figure 2 summarizes the causes and effects of energy production to the environmental destruction.


Figure 2. Environmental impact from major energy production processes

Other minor power generation processes are solar, wind, geothermal, ocean thermal energy, tidal, and other renewable resources. They are the ad hoc energy production alternatives, in response to the serious ecological impact of the major processes or depletion concern of nonrenewable fossil fuel.  Nevertheless, renewable energy facilities also affect wildlife, involve hazardous wastes, or require cooling water, and due to their lower production quantity and higher cost, the effect in enhancing environmental sustainability is limited (4,5,6,7).

1.2. Environmental Impact from Production and Consumption

For ages, human has been employing TDBT to obtain raw material and manufacturing products.  In the process, wastes and pollutants are generated and discharged to the environment; thereby the environment encroached.  Material consumption and waste generation rates are ever increasing.  Pollution abatement and waste reduction technologies based on TDBT offer no radically solutions; only transfer or distribute problems to less immediate impact areas, meanwhile generate secondary pollution. Figure 3 summarizes the causes and effects of environmental destruction by human production and consumption processes.

 

Figure 3. Environmental impact from production and consumption processes

 

2. Environmental Protection and Remediation by MNT

 

MNT's capability to precisely manipulate atoms and molecules makes it possible to revolutionize TTD for energy and material production, and our ways of living (8,9).  Facing survival threat, it's vital to direct MNT innovations toward environmental protection and remediation through integration, so that a sustainable, pollution-free, resource-abundant, green-wealthy nanoecology can be ascertained.

 

To that aim, we can a double approaching method. The first is to control pollution at source. Taking full advantage of MNT so that pollution and waste generation can be minimized or even eliminated. The second is to remedy accumulated environmental problems via MNT.

 

2.1. Control of Pollution at Source by MNT

 

Source control is most effective for TTD, and it remains so for MNT.  TTD has been usurped to minimize human activity impact on the environment.  Its mediocre effect is obliterated by attached secondary pollution and consumption rise. Net damage to the environment still exceeds nature's recovery capacity (8,9).  Using TDBT to meet climbing material demand rendered further environmental damage inevitable and sustainability impossible. MNT’s revolutionary production processes promise eventual total elimination of all pollution sources, needless to mention control, treatment or abatement.

 

2.1.1. Control of Pollution from Energy Production by MNT

 

Energy production processes are extremely destructive to the environment (2,3).  To control pollution from energy production, the first approach is to minimize energy consumption from demand side.  Integrating nanoelectronics, nanoelectromechanical system (NEMS), nanomaterial and etc, a series of novel devices will replace all that developed by TDBT.  Lighter yet stronger material, more energy efficient and less friction enabled by MNT will automatically lead to less energy consumption.  Take illumination for example, Shapiro and his colleagues are developing energy saving InGaN quantum-well structure type of LED to replace all incandescent fixtures (11).

 

The second approach is from the supply side to develop cleaner and more efficient energy production processes.  There are 300 watts of raw solar energy irradiating each square meter of the Earth daily (9).  Harvesting solar energy using TDBT was proven to be not economically feasible during last energy crisis (4).  However, results from frontier nanoelectronics and nanoenergy R&D indicate soon that will both technologically and economically feasible.

 

Nanoenergy developers currently are contemplating on methods to reap this clean and abundant energy. Drexler (9) proposed to resurface existing roads with a coating of high-efficiency solar cells topped by a layer of tough diamond. Battelle researchers are developing a way using solar energy to convert water into oxygen and hydrogen.  AIST Japan has successfully using an artificial photosynthesis system to split water into hydrogen and oxygen under visible light (12).  Scientists at CSIRO Australia are using biomimetic engineering to produce food with solar energy (13,14).  Bennett’s team has developed an artificial photosynthetic membrane can convert sunlight into energy (15).  IMEC is conducting researches on thin-film crystalline Si solar cells, GaAs solar cells, and on new materials and technologies such as plastic solar cells to improve the efficiency and cost of solar cells (16).  Alivisatos and colleagues are developing polymer type solar cells (17).  US Nanosys Inc. and Japan’s Matsushita Electric Works have teamed up to develop nanotechnology based solar cells to be incorporated into building materials for residential and commercial buildings in about four years.

 

From ongoing nanoenergy researches, future energy production system can be visualized. Combusting fossil fuels and even renewable fuels for energy will become obsolete. Dam and powerhouse will be demolished and rivers will return to their original meandering courses. Nuclear reactors will be mothballed and all radioactive substance wait to be safely retrieved contained and properly stored or treated. Energy production processes that generate CO2, SO2, NOx, radioactive wastes and other pollutants will be all banned.  Replacing them into the energy production arena will be entirely solar based; either photoelectrolysis hydrogen fuel energy or photovoltaic energy. 

 

Photoelectrolysis hydrogen fuel energy system uses self-replicating nanobots mimicking first half of photosynthesis to produce hydrogen gas. Fuel cells made of carbon nanotubes are used to interface with all energy consumption.  The hydrogen fuel energy system is conceptualized as Fig. 4.  A MNT photovoltaic solar energy system is also conceptualized as Fig. 5.  In this system, quantum dots type of solar cell coating is applied to building external surface, road pavement, and if necessary specially designed solar trees.  Though MNT does not meddle with atomic nuclear, NEMS will make triggering nuclear fusion easy (18).  Community own small-scale nuclear fusion power plant is possible.  Nevertheless solar energy is ample for us; so far there is no need to tap into fusion energy source.

 


Fig. 4. MNT Photoelectrolysis Hydrogen Fuel Energy System

Other impact from energy production is power distribution system. High voltage transmission lines and towers not only destroy environment but their electromagnetic wave also potentially harmful to human. Developments such as highly advanced solar cells, inexpensive hydrogen fuel cells, and micro-generators of electricity will make many of our electronic products and appliances highly mobile. On-demand and on-location power generation will make decentralized power supplies extensive, affordable, and environmentally clean. (See Fig. 5)  In light of above, it's quite apparent that Three Gorge Hydroelectric Project in China with massive dam construction could be a major decision mistake due to no foresight into MNT's near future energy capability.


Fig. 5. MNT Photovoltaic Solar Energy System

2.1.2. Control of Pollution from Material Production and Product Manufacturing by MNT

Civilization based on TDBT tends to overexploit nature resources, generate pollution and waste during material processing and product manufacturing.  MNT will render that obsolete.  MNT processes will be pollution-free, wastes few and 100% recycled as raw material (9); thereby, waste and pollution dilemma is controlled.  In addition, environmental remediation can proceed by nature and MNT. MNT self-assemblers will manufacture most of the materials.  Materials with high performance, unique properties and functions that traditional industrial processes are impossible to create will be produced.  In addition, the serviceability of nanomaterial will exceed that of material from nature (22).  Therefore except justifiable harvest for ecological balance, all nature exploitation activities will cease.  Usage of petrochemical based material will terminate; environmentally destructive mining also will stop.

 

Nano-photosynthesis can produce sugar, starch for food; further synthesis of cellulose for paper and wood to avoid clear-cutting forests.  Nano-biotechnology can yield protein and collagen to stop animal slaughtering.  Carbon retrieved from atmosphere and recycled from existing wastes by MNT will be used to make carbon nanotubes, that are far superior than steel. Carbon will be the most common structural and functional element for a MNT based civilization (9).  A carbon based MNT material production model is conceptualized as Fig. 6.  If there is specific need for metal, nanofactory with trillions of nanoassembler can synthesize steel (9), copper and alloy to skip mining and refining.  Thereby, industrial wastewater, wastes and air pollution will all vanish.

 


Fig. 6. MNT Carbon Based Material Production System

 

Nevertheless to preserve quality and style of living, some farming activities will persist. Highly efficient MNT farming will use no pesticide and herbicide, occupy less land and generate no agricultural waste. Drexler (8,9) suggested that nano-robots (nanobots) built and maintained, high-performance greenhouses covering approximately 10% of current farmland could feed the world's population and free-up millions square miles of land to return to native habitat and thus the great extinction of species halted and sustainability assured.

 

One other essential material for human survival is drinking water. Global population is increasing while fresh water supplies are decreasing.  United Nations predicts that by the year 2025 that 48 countries will be short of fresh water accounting for 32% of the world’s population (19).  Ecological recovery by dint of MNT will make raw water for water supply cleaner and more abundant; however drinking water treatment still necessary.

 

TDBT potable water treatment consumes large quantity of chemicals for coagulation, flocculation and disinfection.  The process also needs to dam the river and produces chemical sludge that are harmful to the environment.  The treated water contains disinfectant residual and in some cases trihalomethanes (THMs) that are detrimental to human health.  The costly water distribution network not only encroach the environment but also provide chances for chemical and biological recontamination.

 

A series of nanodevices can be devised to revolutionize water treatment process. Nanobots like nanoflocculant or nanocoagulant can be devised to neutralize the surface charge of suspended solids. They are non-chemical and 100% reusable. Smart non-fouling nanomembrane or nanoseparator can be developed to selectively separate dissolved solids while keeping beneficial minerals in the water, or to desalinate brine water (20,21).  Nano-disinfectant such as UV nanobots can accomplish germicidal task without leaving toxic residual and producing no THMs. Nanocondenser can be developed to extract water from air. Integrating these unit nanoprocesses and powered by abundant nano-solar energy, different water treatment systems can be designed to fit specific geographical conditions. Such development will make huge waterworks with messy piping system obsolete. On-demand and on-location generation of drinking water from liquid or vapor will make decentralized water supplies extensive, affordable, and environmentally clean.  A MNT’s future on-demand and on-location generation of drinking water system is conceptualized as Fig. 7.

 


Fig. 7. MNT On-demand and On-location Generation of Drinking Water System

 

2.1.3. Control of Pollution from Human Consumption MNT

 

Distributed pollution sources from human consumption cumulatively have contributed significantly to destruction of the environment. Air pollution from living, municipal wastewater and solid wastes are the subjects to reinvestigate under MNT for novel solutions.

 

Consumer products and their packaging will be 100% biodegradable or recyclable to terminate solid waste problem. Products during or after consuming may create pollution will be replaced with environmental friendly nanomaterial. CFC propellants can be replaced by non-halogen gas; VOC emitting solvents can use nanowater (9) as alternative.  TTD is making great stride on this issue; yet with MNT, it will become a technological and economical surety.  This eventually will stop air pollution originated from our consumption process.

 

MNT has no means to change municipal wastewater generation, unless lifestyle is altered.  Nevertheless, MNT can revolutionize wastewater treatment (10).  Wastewater will be 100% human waste, contain no heavy metals and toxic chemicals.  Human waste contains organics that are resource to nature, yet current treatment process uses electricity generated from fossil fuels to “waste” a resource, no wonder it can’t solve the problem to the root.  Future MNT wastewater treatment will discard the large-scale centralized wastewater treatment plant philosophy.  Decentralized on-site treatment will eliminate the environmental impact from odorous and costly sewage treatment and collection system.  MNT can develop smart nanobots to separate water and solids at each household or small community.  Separated water can be recycled and further treated as discussed above for drinking water.  Extracted solids can be stabilized biologically, if needed with the assistance of nanobots, and then consumed as fertilizer or animal feed.

 

2.2. Remediation of Existing Environmental Problems

 

Since 18th century industrial revolution till 20th century information age, we have accumulated a grave environmental liability (8,9) that result in several potentially harmful problems.  Among them the most notorious are acid rain, global warming, ozone layer depletion, contaminated water and soil, and large piles of nuclear waste.  Due to technological and economical limitations, we can only deal with the most threatening by transferring it to less threatening, “out of sight, out of mind” is the general adopted philosophy.  MNT now first time in human history offers us the capability to payoff the accumulated debt and return nature to its pristine state.

 

2.2.1. Acid Rain and Smog

 

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) are the primary causes of acid rain and smog (23,24). Acid rain causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to damage of forests and forest soils. In addition, acid rain accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our civilization's heritage (25). The strength of the effects depends inversely on buffer capacity of the waters and soils involved.  While in atmosphere, SO2 and NOx gases and their derivatives, sulfates, nitrates and ozone, contribute to visibility degradation and harm public health (24).

 

Once MNT enabled solar energy become exclusive energy source, our long-term energy umbilical cord that ties with fossil fuel can finally be severed.  In addition, future vehicles that constructed with nanomaterial, driven by nanoelectromechanical system and powered by hydrogen fuel cell or solar cell will totally eliminate transportation related SO2 and NOx emission.  Therefore, the anthropogenic SO2 and NOx that assault our atmosphere since industrial revolution can be ceased; thus further acidification to the environment and threatening to human health can be relieved.

 

Nanobots such as nano-desulfurizer can be sent up to the atmosphere to capture SO2 gas, reduce it to sulfur and precipitate to earth surface as dust; nano-sulfur-precipitator contains calcium or magnesium ion can be sent up into sky to oxidize SO2 and then form CaSO4 or MgSO4 salts. Nanobots like nano-catalytic-converter can also be sent up into atmosphere to converter NOx into nitrogen and oxygen. If the agriculture technology still needs fertilizer, nanobots like nano- NOx-reducer can be sent up to capture NOx and transform it into ammonia and bring it down to the ground. For ground level treatment, the acidified waterbodies and soil, we can disseminate a troop of nano-buffer to increase their buffer capacity in resisting acidity. We can also deploy an army of nano-neutralizer to dynamically adjust pH in water or soil to their original condition, either by capturing H+ from the environment or giving off OH- to the environment.

 

2.2.2. Global Warming

The culprit of global warming is the excess greenhouse effect gas-CO2 that our fuel-burning civilization has dumped into the atmosphere.  Before MNT, something like 300 billion tons of excess CO2 have been added to the atmosphere (10).  Climatologists project that climbing carbon dioxide levels, by trapping solar energy, will partially melt the polar caps, raising sea levels and flooding coasts sometime in the middle of the next century (26).  By applying MNT to energy production will enable solar power to be generated at an affordable cost.  This will eliminate fossil fuel power generation as well as CO2 emission; and thereby relieve the worry of a flooding catastrophe.

MNT will also enable us to develop nanomachines or nanobots such as nano-photosynthesizer (11,12,13) nano-chlorophyll, nano-carbon-fixer, and etc.  Powered by the cheap solar energy, these nanobots not only can be manipulated to extract all the 300 billion tons of excess CO2 from atmosphere, but also can transform them into valuable materials.  The carbon extracted by nanobots can be used in synthesizing functional and structural materials.  It can also be extracted by other nanobots and further synthesized into sugar, starch, and cellulose to supplement our demand for food, paper and etc. (See Fig. 6).  This can meanwhile relief the pressure we exert on farmland and forest.  If there should have excess carbon remained, we can place it back into the coal seams and oil fields from which it came.

2.2.3. Ozone Layer Depletion

 

The chief threats to the ozone layer are CFCs and halons (27).  Of the 682 million kilograms of CFCs consumed globally during 1991, 32 percent for refrigerants, 28 percent for blowing agents, 20 percent for cleaning agents, and 18 percent for propellants.  Among that each one molecule of chlorine in CFC is capable of degrading over 100,000 molecules of ozone before it is removed from the stratosphere or becomes part of an inactive compound (28).  Facing the destructive power of these ozone-depleting substances (ODS) (29,30), The Montreal Protocol, an international agreement is drafted by world governments to protect the ozone layer (31,32).

 

The relative potency of the different ODS depends on the stability of the reservoir compounds. Bromine reservoirs, such as HBr and BrONO2 are 10 to 100 times more effective than chlorine at destroying ozone (28).  The non-reactivity of ODS, so desirable to industry, allows them to drift for years in the environment until they eventually reach the stratosphere.  High in the stratosphere, intense UV solar radiation severs halogens off of the ODS, and it is these unattached halogens that are able to catalytically convert ozone molecules into oxygen molecules (29).  Different ODS require different time to remove from the stratosphere.  It ranges from 50 to over 200 years; so while it is cheering to see that the growth-rate of ODP (Ozone Depletition Potential) in the atmosphere is starting to drop, without MNT stepping in, the impact of ODS on stratospheric ozone will continue well into the 22nd century.

 

Future MNT mainly will sparingly use water as solvent, and can 100% recycle them (9).  Even at this pre-breakthrough stage, ODS refrigerants can be replaced at a higher cost. MNT will help lower that cost to negligible.  Therefore the growth rate of ODP in ODS reservoir will be become zero.  As to the ODS remaining in the reservoir, Drexler (9) proposed using sodium containing balloon type nanobots.  The nanobots powered by nano-solar cells collects CFCs and separates out the chlorine in the stratosphere. Combining this with sodium makes sodium chloride.  When the sodium is gone, the balloon collapses and falls.  Eventually, a grain of salt and a biodegradable speck fall to Earth. The stratospheric CFC can be removed soon.

 

Extending from Drexler's idea, nanobots containing other metals such as calcium and magnesium can also be devised to remove stratospheric CFC.  Among ODS, halogens other than chlorine, such as bromine can be neutralized by using the same tactics: deploying an army of airborne solar energy powered metal containing nanobots into the stratospheric ODS reservoir.  The originally expected 200 years' drag of ODS impact can be shortened to just a few years after the actual deployment date of the halogen neutralizing nanobots.  Fig. 8 is a conceptual idea of how ODS reservoir in the stratosphere can be resolved by solar powered airborne metal nanobots to relieve ozone depletion problem.

 


Fig. 8. MNT Solution to Stratospheric Ozone Depletion Substance

 

2.2.4. Toxic Wastes and Water and Soil Contaminations

 

Toxic wastes whether collected in piles or in contaminated surface water, groundwater, or soil concern us because they can harm living systems.  The contaminants can be organic or inorganic.  The organic contaminants, such as PCB, Dioxin, and etc. actually consist of harmless atoms arranged into noxious molecules.  The inorganic contaminants contain toxic elements, such as lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium.

 

In the prospect of MNT, worldwide existing "Love Canal" contaminated dumpsites can be easily clean up. After identified the chemical properties of the organic contaminants, specific nanobots for attacking specific contaminants at their weak points can be devised.  An army of these nanobots can then be deployed into contaminated site, whether it’s in water or soil to render the contaminants harmless by rearranging their atoms.  The nanobots can be designed decayable, so no retrieval needed after mission completed.  They can also be designed reprogramable, so after each task, they can be retrieved and reprogrammed for other cleaning tasks.

 

Inorganic contaminants can also be collected by specifically designed nanobots.  Trillions of them can be sent into contaminated waterbodies or soil to detect these toxic elements and store them inside.  The nanobots are then retrieved from the site, instructed to release toxicants, and then ready for other tasks. The released concentrated metal ions can be rebuilt into rocks in the mines by nanobots or fused to stable form by nanomachine and returned to nature.  If there is any material additives demand for specific metal ion, they can be used as raw material.

 

2.2.5. Nuclear Wastes

 

MNT cannot treat nuclear wastes and render them harmless directly, for MNT only work with atoms and molecules, not nuclei.  Yet indirectly, by lowering the cost of energy and equipment, MNT can offer us the means for a clean, permanent solution to the untreatable nuclear wastes left over from the nuclear era.

 

Nuclear wastes can be collected, concentrated by specific nanobots. Products of MNT could help with conventional approaches to dealing with nuclear waste, helping to store it in the most stable, reliable forms possible.  Using nanomachines, we could seal them in self-sealing containers and powered by cheap nano-solar energy (10).  These would be more secure than any passive rock or cask.  When MNT has developed cheap, reliable spacecraft, the concentrated nuclear wastes can be transported to the moon and bury them in moon’s dead, dry rock by nanobots, or to other planets that still radioactive, or even shoot them directly into the sun.

 

Underground nano-atom smasher powered by cheap solar cells can also be devised to treat nuclear wastes. This is a reverse process of nuclear engineering.  Instead of smashing nonradioactive target and harvesting for radioactive substance, the nanomachine will smash radioactive target and harvest for nonradioactive substance.  The smashing and harvesting process will continue stability is achieved.  Fig. 9 illustrates a few routes for resolving nuclear waste piles that accumulated in the environment and TDBT is at loss on dealing with them.

 


Fig. 9. MNT Solutions to Accumulated Piles of Nuclear Waste on Earth

 

3. Conclusions

 

MNT is powerful and realizable within our lifetime, yet it's a tool.  To survive with quality, we need a real sustainable environment.  MNT has great potential to restore the environment to its original pristine state and ascertain sustainability. However, the development of MNT now is sporadic, much is aimed at further economic growth and less is at environmental sustainability.  System integration of MNT is vital for sooner realization of MNT's benefits.  Redirect some MNT R&D to environmental remediation is essential for true environmental sustainability.

 

References

 

1.           National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Benchmarking Air Emissions of Utility Electric Generators in the Eastern U.S. (visited Aug. 16, 1999); http://www.crest.org/clients/can/old/nrdc/chap3.htm.

2.           Pace University Center for Environmental Legal Studies, Environmental Costs of Electricity (1990).

3.           Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation (ESEERCO), New York State Environmental Externalities Cost Study Vol. 1 (1995).

4.           The Energy Project, Land and Water Fund of the Rockies, How the West Can Win: A Blueprint for a Clean and Affordable Energy Future (1996).

5.           Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology (CREST), A Summary of Recent Studies on the Health Effects of Air Pollution; http://www.crest.org/clients/can/old/alareport.htm.

6.           EPA, EPA's Clean Air Power Initiative; http://www.epa.gov/ardpublic/capihome/capi1.html

7.           Union of Concerned Scientists – USA: Environmental Impacts of Renewable Energy Technologies; http://www.ucsusa.org/energy/brief.renimpacts.html

8.           K. Eric Drexler, Engine of Creation, Healing And Protecting The Earth, Anchor Press, Doubleday, New York, 1986; http://www.foresight.org/EOC/section02of05

9.           K. Eric Drexler, Chris Peterson and Gayle Pergamit, Unbounding the Future: the Nanotechnology Revolution, Restoring the Environment, William Morrow and Company, New York, 1991; http://www.foresight.org/UTF/Unbound_LBW/chapt_9.html.

10.       Doug Mulhall, Statement on NanoEcology, Foresight Institute, Palo Alto, California, 2002; http://www.foresight.org/nanoecology/Mulhall.html

11.       Shapiro and et. al., Dependence of the luminescence energy in InGaN quantum-well structures on applied biaxial strain, Phys. Rev. B. 62, R16318, 2000;

12.       Kazuhiro Sayama, Kazuaki, Mukasa, Ryu Abe, Yoshimoto Abe, and Hironori Arakawa, Photocatalytic Water Splitting System into H2 and O2 under Visible Light Irradiation Mimicking a Z-Scheme Mechanism in Photosynthesis, Solar Light Energy Conversion Team, Photoreaction Control Research Center, Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan, PCPM2002, Poster Presentation http://www.aist.go.jp/aist_e/new_research/20011206_1/20011206_1.html

13.       Ken Hews-Taylor, Artificial Photosynthesis, Basic Research in Biomimetic Applications: Multilayer Organic Photovoltaic Cell, CSIRO, Australia, 2002; http://www.tip.csiro.au/IMP/NanoScience/ArtificialPhotosynthesis/photovoltaicCell1.htm

14.       Stevens, G.B., Reda, T., Raguse, B., Braach-Maksvytis, V. and Tilbrook, D., Electrochemical reduction of CO2 at a 200 nm porous Au film electrode in aqueous KHCO3 electrolyte under near-ambient conditions, CSIRO, Australia, Conference paper: presented at IPS 2000, Colorado, USA; http://www.tip.csiro.au/IMP/NanoScience/ArtificialPhotosynthesis/gasDiffusion1.htm

15.       Bennett and et. al., Active transport of Ca2+ by an artificial photosynthetic membrane, Nature 420, 398–401; doi:10.1038/nature01209, 2002;

16.       J.F. Nijs, J. Szlufcik, J. Poortmans and R.P. Mertens, Crystalline Silicon Based Photovoltaic: Technology and Market Trends, Modern Physics Letters B, Vol. 15, Nos. 17, 18 & 19 (2001) 571-578, World Scientific Publishing Company;

17.       Alivisatos and et. al., Hybrid Nanorod-Polymer Solar Cells, Science, Mar 29 2002: 2425-2427.

18.        André Gsponer and Jean-Pierre Hurni, The Physical Principles of Thermonuclear Explosives, Inertial Confinement Fusion, and the Quest for Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons, INESAP Technical Report No.1, Presented at the 1997 INESAP Conference, Shanghai, China, 8-10 September 1997, Seventh edition, September 2000, ISBN: 3-9333071-02-X, 195 pp.

19.       NNI: The Initiative and Its Implementation Plan”, page 95

20.       Matteo Pasquali and Anatoly Kolomeisky, Polymer Flow on the Nanoscale, Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology, Rice University, 2002; http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~cben/PolymerFlow.shtml

21.       Mark Wiesner, Andrew Barron and Vicki Colvin, Nanostructured Membranes and their Applications, Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology, Rice University, 2002; http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~cben/Membranes.shtml

22.       Watanabe Makoto, A Future Society Built by Nanotechnology, Science & Technology Group, Environment, Science & Technology Bureau, the Japan Federation of Economic Organizations (Keidanren), 2001; http://www.jef.or.jp/en/jti/200109_010.html

23.       National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program Biennial Report to Congress: An Integrated Assessment; http://www.nnic.noaa.gov/CENR/NAPAP?NAPAP_96.htm

24.       United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Environmental Effects of Acid Rain; http://www.epa.gov/acidrain/effects/envben.html

25.       United States Geological Survey, USGS Tracks Acid Rain; http://bqs.usgs.gov/acidrain/arfs.html

26.       T.E.Graedel and P.J.Crutzen, Atmospheric Change: an Earth System Perspective, 2nd ed., Freeman, New York (1993)

27.       McFarland, M., and J. Kaye. 1992. Chlorofluorocarbons and ozone. Photochemistry and Photobiology 55: 911-29.

28.       Washington University in St. Louis, Effects of Ozone Pollution http://www.nslc.wustl.edu/Outreach/currentSite/Ozone/troposphere/health.html.

29.       Farman, J. C., B. G. Gardiner, and J. D. Shanklin. 1985. Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315: 207-10.

30.       Anderson, J. G., W. H. Brune, and M. H. Proffitt. 1989. Ozone destruction by chlorine radicals within the Antarctic vortex: The spatial and temporal evolution of ClO-O3 anticorrelation based on in situ ER-2 data. Journal of Geophysical Research 94 (D): 11,465-79

31.       Office of Air and Radiation (OAR), EPA, Proposed Rule for Reducing Regional Transport of Ground Level Ozone (Smog): Federal Register Notice; http://www.crest.org/clients/can/old/otagfr.htm

32.       The Montreal Protocol on Substances that deplete the Ozone Layer, United Nations Environment Programme, The Ozone Secretariat, 1987; .http://www.unep.org/ozone/montreal.shtml

Better view w/ full screen. ©All Rights Reserved by TAINANO, Inc., 2000-2003    Webmaster e-mail:wm@tainano.com